"The profile of effectiveness of the mediator from the perspective of negotiation"

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Jan 12, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v6.739
Keywords:
Negotiating effectiveness family mediation

Main Article Content

Guayarmina Santana Rodríguez
Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canarias
Heriberto Rodríguez Mateo
Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canarias

Abstract

The present study is to analyze the predictive value of an instrument designed for negotiating effectively (CEN II) in its application to mediation. From a conceptual approach to the field of study and scientific contributions related to the subject is delimited. Empirical research was carried out through a sample of 60 mediators / as results obtained confirm the reliability and predictive validity of the CEN II and efficiency in determining differences in family mediation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Santana Rodríguez, G., & Rodríguez Mateo, H. (2014). "The profile of effectiveness of the mediator from the perspective of negotiation". International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 6(1), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v6.739
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2014): PSYCHOLOGY AND MODERN WORLD
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Alzate Sáez de Heredia, R. (1998). Análisis y resolución de conflictos: Una perspectiva psicológica. Bilbao: Servicio editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.

Barry, B. & Friedman, R.A. (1998). Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74.

Bazerman, M. H. & Neale, M.A. (1993) La negociación racional. Barcelona. Paidós.

Carnevale, P. J., & Pegnetter, R. (1985). The selection of mediation tactics in public sector disputes: A contingency analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 41(2), 65-81.

Gutiérrez, F. y Vila J.O. (2011). Psicología del desarrollo. II. Madrid: UNED.

Jensen-Campbell, L. A & Graciano, W.G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderador of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 9, 323-362.

Kolb, D. (1989). Labor mediators, managers, and ombudsmen: Roles mediators play in different contexts. En K. Kressel, y D. G. Pruitt, (eds.): Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Thirdparty Intervention. San Francisco: JosseyBass, pp.91-114.

Mastenbroek, W.F. (1987) Conflict management and organization development. New York. Wiley.

Mastenbroek, W.F. (1991) “Development and negotiating skills”. Kremenyuk, V. A. International Negotiation: analysis, approaches, is sues. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.

Pruitt, D. G. (1983) “Strategic Choice in negotiation”. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 2.

Ripoll- Millet, Aleix. (2001). Familias, Trabajo Social y Mediación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Rozemblum, S. (2007). Mediación y resolución de conflictos en la comunidad. Barcelona: Graó.

Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt; D.G. & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2º ed). Nueva Cork: McGraw-Hill.

Serrano, G. y Rodríguez, D. (1993). Negociación en las Organizaciones. EUDEMA Universidad.

Serrano. (1996) ¿Qué dice la investigación científica sobre la negociación? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las organizaciones, 12, 2-3, 127-147.

Serrano, Rodríguez y Cunha (1996) Evaluación de la Eficacia Negociadora: El CEN II.

Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical frontiers. Psychology Press.

Van De Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C., & Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 271.